Home

Poll

During the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, who stressed the Right to Bear Arms more dilligently?
The Federalist
0%
The Anti Federalists
50%
Both stressed it's importance Equally
50%
Total votes: 2

User login

What Citizens are Saying...

Affinity matches

Login to see your affinity matches.

Blog Listing

KEEPING OUR FRIENDS CLOSE...

...and OUR ENEMIES CLOSER

Most of us know how important Supreme Court positions and decisions are in relation to the preservation of freedom and sovereignty. The founders created a tightly balanced system of governance with a naturally checked power structure but sometimes liberty snuffing litigation has gotten the thumbs up from the bench setting precedents that creates law that we have to live with. This site and particularly, this section plans on keeping super diligent in staying alert of cases that will have that tendency.

Amicus Curiae n: Latin term meaning "friend of the court"

The name for an informational brief filed with the court by someone who is not a party to the litigation, but who believes that the court's decision to be very important and may affect negatively or positively their interests or the interests of others. Perhaps eventually we can expedite such filings but for now...

Find Current Supreme Court Cases Here

and we can post relevant items HERE and discuss important Cases being Argued there and at all levels our Court System.

Though the High court is obviously very important and has overarching ramifications, most Freedoms and Rights are affected by precedent and statutory Laws litigated in the lower courts so we will also need to keep aware of those. Links will be provides soon.

Some studies have shown a positive correlation between number of amicus briefs filed in support of granting certiorari, and the Court's decision to grant certiorari.

Amicus Curiae briefs are filed in many Supreme Court matters, both at the Petition for Writ of Certiorari stage, and when the Court is deciding a case on its merits. Some studies have shown a positive correlation between number of amicus briefs filed in support of granting certiorari, and the Court's decision to grant certiorari. Some friend of the court briefs provide valuable information about legal arguments, or how a case might affect people other than the parties to the case. Some organizations file friend of the court briefs in an attempt to "lobby" the Supreme Court, obtain media attention, or impress members.

"An amicus curiae brief that brings to the attention of the Court relevant matter not already brought to its attention by the parties may be of considerable help to the Court. An amicus curiae brief that does not serve this purpose burdens the Court, and its filing is not favored." Rule 37(1), Rules of the Supreme Court of the U.S.

A brief of an amicus curiae may be filed only if accompanied by written consent of all parties, or by leave of court granted on motion or at the request of the court, except that consent or leave shall not be required when the brief is presented by the United States or an officer or agency thereof, or by a State, Territory or Commonwealth. The brief may be conditionally filed with the motion for leave. A motion for leave shall identify the interest of the applicant and shall state the reasons why a brief of an amicus curiae is desirable. Save as all parties otherwise consent, any amicus curiae shall file its brief within the time allowed the party whose position as to affirmance or reversal the amicus brief will support unless the court for cause shown shall grant leave for a later filing, in which event it shall specify within what period an opposing party may answer. A motion of an amicus curiae to participate in the oral argument will be granted only for extraordinary reasons." Rule 29. Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

client = pub-5279509057540533
slot = 3916031980
width = 336
height = 280

Syndicate

Syndicate content

client = pub-5279509057540533
slot = 5296905871
width = 160
height = 600